Charles Brennan provided testimony in support of HB26-1012, which would have required sellers to provide consumers with the prices of the delivered goods and the goods available at the store for price transparency and fairness. It also would have prohibited unfair or deceptive trade practices by charging unreasonably excessive prices for goods and services.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of worker protections
Chris Nelson provided testimony in strong support of House Bill 26-1054, which would allow Colorado to step in to address declining workplace safety standards due to federal rollbacks and decline in enforcement, and allows for individual workers and labor unions to enforce their rights through private right of action.
CCLP testifies against HOAs requiring “proof of need” for language access
Morgan Turner provided testimony against HB26-1201 which would require owner's to provide "proof of need" prior to HOAs providing correspondence and notices in a language other than English.
CCLP testifies in support of ITINs for non-educational opportunities
Milena Tayah provided testimony in support of HB26-1143, which addresses the background check barrier for educational opportunities. It would require that an ITIN be allowed in lieu of a SSN when required for these background checks.
New CCLP Issue Brief released: Life after Chevron

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year to overturn the Chevron doctrine marked one of the most consequential shifts in administrative law in decades.
For over 40 years, courts deferred to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes, allowing expert regulators to shape policies that govern health care, workers’ rights, housing, civil rights, and more. The Roberts Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, coupled with the statute of limitations-resetting decision in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors, dismantled this precedent, shifting the balance of power significantly, with courts assuming a greater role in determining the scope of regulatory authority.
The implications of these two decisions are profound, touching nearly every aspect of public policy. While we are uncertain how future courts may move forward without deference to Chevron, the potential of these rulings in tandem is concerning, particularly in light of President Trump’s unprecedented attacks on federal agencies and their public servants since the start of his second administration this year.
Given the dramatic changes to the administrative state in just a few short months, CCLP’s Litigation Director Annie Martínez has produced a comprehensive issue brief analyzing the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine. The brief, Life after Chevron, explores how the two court rulings shift power from federal agencies to the courts, affecting critical policy areas including health care, workers’ rights, housing, and civil rights. From there, the brief explores paths for continued agency influence and policy oversight, particularly through legislative collaboration, strategic rulemaking, and guidance development.
Key findings
The brief highlights several major policy areas affected by the Court’s decision:
- The end of the Chevron Doctrine marks a shift in how courts must rule on interpretations of law by federal executive branch agencies.
- Potential implications for the Loper Bright decision must be examined in the light of the Corner Post case the Supreme Court also ruled last year, which changes the statute of limitations for claims against federal regulations.
- Regulations affecting every aspect of American life may be upended by these two Supreme Court decisions, as regulated entities may choose to file new claims against even long-standing regulations. However, the outcomes of such challenges are yet to be determined.
- Particular areas of regulation which are relevant in the fight against poverty include health, worker’s rights, housing, and disability, and civil rights.
- Loper Bright and Corner Post do not directly impact state-level regulation in Colorado.
- While these decisions leave much of the administrative state on less stable ground, federal agencies still have key opportunities to influence legislation and continue to maintain their areas of oversight.
Download the full issue brief Life after Chevron in our resource library.
