Charles Brennan provided testimony in support of HB26-1012, which would have required sellers to provide consumers with the prices of the delivered goods and the goods available at the store for price transparency and fairness. It also would have prohibited unfair or deceptive trade practices by charging unreasonably excessive prices for goods and services.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of worker protections
Chris Nelson provided testimony in strong support of House Bill 26-1054, which would allow Colorado to step in to address declining workplace safety standards due to federal rollbacks and decline in enforcement, and allows for individual workers and labor unions to enforce their rights through private right of action.
CCLP testifies against HOAs requiring “proof of need” for language access
Morgan Turner provided testimony against HB26-1201 which would require owner's to provide "proof of need" prior to HOAs providing correspondence and notices in a language other than English.
CCLP testifies in support of ITINs for non-educational opportunities
Milena Tayah provided testimony in support of HB26-1143, which addresses the background check barrier for educational opportunities. It would require that an ITIN be allowed in lieu of a SSN when required for these background checks.
A win for Medicaid recipients in Talevski

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. Talevski. Talevski involved a nursing home resident who was given a high dose of psychotropic medications against his will and was repeatedly transferred to facilities far away from his family. The family sued the nursing facility by relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – a federal law that allows individuals to sue state actors for civil rights or federal statutory violations.
Section 1983 has consistently been used to ensure that state actors comply with constitutional provisions and federal statutes, including the Medicaid Act. Such a safeguard is needed for Coloradans with disabilities and low-income Coloradans who rely on Medicaid for preventative, acute, long-term, and other forms of health care that are otherwise out of their financial reach. The reality is that state and local agencies sometimes fail to meet federal requirements of the Medicaid program, and when that happens, the intended beneficiaries must be able to turn to the courts for protection against ongoing harm.
Given the impact this case would have had on Coloradan beneficiaries and CCLP’s ability to enforce public assistance laws, CCLP joined the National Health Law Program (NHeLP) and forty-two other non-profit organizations in a “friend of the court” – or amicus curiae – brief to explain why the Court should not depart from precedent. We also released a statement before oral arguments, sharing concerns about the Court’s decision to hear this case given the well-established law.
The court heard arguments on November 8, 2022, which left advocates hopeful after republican appointees like Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh expressed hesitancy about overruling precedent. Fortunately, the Court surprised us all and ruled 7-2 in favor of Mr. Talevski’s estate, upholding the rights of beneficiaries to seek legal recourse when state officials violate their rights under the Medicaid Act. This is a victory not only for Medicaid recipients but also for those who depend on states to implement federal laws regarding housing, nutrition, education, disability, and various other safety net programs. Advocates for low-income individuals are relieved that the Court has affirmed this right.
