Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, provided testimony against House Bill 26-1327, which aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of constitutional rights in Colorado
Annie Martínez provided testimony in strong support of Senate Bill 26-176, which would have allowed Coloradans to hold federal actors accountable in constitutional rights violations.
Skills2Compete CO testifies in support of older workers
Chaer Robert provided testimony on behalf of Skills2Compete Colorado on House Bill 26-1010, Older Adult Support & Representation in the Workforce, which would increase participation, representation, and support for older adults in the workforce, beginning at 55 years of age.
CCLP testifies on reducing administrative burden on the health care industry
Bethany Pray provided testimony on Senate Bill 26-138, Reducing Administrative Burdens on Health Care. CCLP is in an amend position because we prioritize reducing administrative and economic burdens for patients.
CCLP testifies on overtime pay for farmworkers

On Thursday, March 19, 2026, Charles Brennan, Income and Housing Policy Director at CCLP, provided testimony in opposition to Senate Bill 26-121, Overtime Threshold for Agricultural Employees and in support of Senate Bill 26-081, Increase Agricultural Employee Overtime Protections. SB26-121 would require farmworkers to work a minimum of 60 hours per week to receive overtime pay, whereas SB26-081 would have increased overtime protections for farmworkers after 40 hours per week, ensuring consistency with other workers in Colorado for overtime pay. Unfortunately, SB26-081 was postponed indefinitely.
Chair and members of the committee, my name is Charles Brennan, Director of Income and Housing Policy at the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every Coloradan. I am here today in opposition to SB26-121 and in support of SB26-081.
Congress excluded farmworkers from the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act, an inequity Colorado has still not fully corrected. We took an important step in 2021, and after a five-year implementation period, agricultural workers now receive overtime after 48 hours per week. That threshold is already a compromise. SB26-121 would move it to 60 hours across the board, requiring farmworkers to put in 20 hours more than any other Colorado worker each week before overtime kicks in.
Overtime protections exist for good reason. Agricultural work involves extreme heat, chemical exposure, and heavy lifting—conditions that make long hours particularly dangerous. The fatal injury rate in agriculture in Colorado was 17.6 per 1,000 workers in 2024, nearly six times the rate for all industries in the state.[1] Research shows workers who log 60 or more hours per week face a 23% greater risk of on-the-job injury.[2] SB26-121 would raise the threshold at which those protections apply in an already dangerous industry.
We also question whether this bill targets the right problem. Fewer than one in five Colorado farm operations reported paying wages to hired workers in the 2022 Census of Agriculture.[3] Even among those that do, workers at highly seasonal operations currently receive overtime after 56 hours during peak weeks—meaning this bill would raise the overtime threshold for some of the most heavily worked farmworkers in the state by just 4 hours.[4]
Meanwhile, over half of all farms reported costs for property taxes, fuel, repairs, and animal feed—and between 2017 and 2022, fertilizer costs alone rose nearly 10% per year due to disruptions in the market from the war in Ukraine[5]—disruptions we are starting to see again due to our conflict with Iran.[6] The conflict’s upward pressures on fuel prices are also a growing expense to farmers. These are the costs affecting the majority of operations, and none of them have anything to do with overtime pay.
We urge the committee to oppose SB26-121 and support SB26-081, and we encourage the sponsors to pursue relief for Colorado’s agricultural industry through approaches that do not come at the expense of its workers. Thank you.
**********
[1] https://www.bls.gov/iif/state-data/fatal-injury-rates-by-state-and-industry-2024.htm
[2] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1741083/
[3]https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_County_Level/Colorado/st08_2_007_007.pdf
[4]https://cdle.colorado.gov/sites/cdle/files/info_%2312a_overtime_and_minimum_wage_for_agricultural_employment_2026%29_12.18.2025.pdf
[5]https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Colorado/st08_1_004_004.pdf
[6] https://www.fb.org/market-intel/middle-east-tensions-raise-spring-planting-concerns
