May 17, 2022

Recent articles

2022 Legislative Wrap-Up

This year’s legislative session has been an intense one to say the least, but with many positive results for Coloradans

experiencing poverty. Major priority bills required research, testimony and support from CCLP — as well as our partner organizations, and our network of anti-poverty advocates — to get across the finish line. Other bills required active opposition on multiple fronts. Many of these bills came down to the wire, only passing in the waning hours of the session, but despite the late nights and furious activity, 2022 has proven another triumphant session for Coloradans.

HousingLegislative Wrap Up Infographic A

We are very happy to share that the “Clean Slate” bill, SB22-099, passed out of both the house and senate.

As you heard in our Legislative Preview event in January (link to video), this bill will improve Coloradans’ ability to have non-conviction and conviction records sealed, supporting expanded opportunities for a population that faces enormous obstacles to securing employment, housing, and economic stability.

In coalition with Interfaith Alliance and other state allies, and national groups like Code for America and the Clean Slate Initiative, CCLP contributed hours of research, drafting, and stakeholding to address complex concerns and create a more streamlined sealing process. The hard work of everyone involved appears to have made a difference: the bipartisan bill saw remarkable support in the end, passing the house last week with an incredible 61-to-4 vote. It now awaits the Governor’s signature.

HB22-1287: Protections for Mobile Home Park Residents is headed to the Governor as well. This priority bill addresses concerns of mobile home park residents, by seeking to make modifications to the resident “opportunity to purchase” under CCLP’s HB20-1201, as well as expanding enforcement under the Mobile Home Park Dispute and Resolution Enforcement Program.

Originally this bill had also sought to limit park lot rent increases, a provision that was removed at the threat of veto by Governor Polis. Despite this loss, however, the bill retains crucial provisions to better protect mobile home park residents, such as relocation assistance in case of park closure.

Mobile homes make up a significant percentage of the dwindling affordable housing stock in Colorado. Colorado has about 900 mobile home parks, with 100,000 Coloradans living in mobile homes. Mobile home parks residents average $39,000 in household income, and are disproportionately 65 or older (27%), people with disabilities (39%) or Latinos (29%). A majority of these Coloradans own their homes, but not the land under them.

Legislative Wrap Up Infographic B

One provision of HB1287 would have created a $35 million ARPA loan fund, to assist with transition to resident ownership upon sale of mobile home (MH) parks. This provision was split off from the bill and became SB22-160: Loan Program Resident-Owned Communities. Though it became a separate bill, SB22-160 is instrumental in realizing HB1287’s effectiveness. CCLP and others had advocated this set aside for mobile home parks through the Interim Transformation Committee on Affordable Housing. Providing an opportunity for park ownership gives residents more control of the land they live on, more predictability, and more economic stability. We are happy to say that this bill passed house and senate as well.

In coalition with 9to5 Colorado, Colorado Poverty Law Project, Colorado Coalition of Mobile Home Owners (CoCoMHO), Together Colorado, local governments and the extensive Rights for Residents Coalition, we made solid progress with these two bills while cementing a strong coalition to help equalize the power imbalance between Mobile Home Park owners and investors, and those who rent or own the mobile homes in them.

Food

CCLP had been working with Sen. Dominick Moreno to address a key recommendation from the recent CCLP report on SNAP hearings. The drafted bill’s key provision was the creation of a public database to house SNAP hearing decisions, accessible and free to advocates and the general public. Though this bill did not move forward in 2022, we expect to bring another bill in 2023.

In the meantime, CCLP advocated before the Joint Budget Committee (JBC) about the effort by the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) to bring some SNAP hearings “in-house” rather than having those cases heard at the Office of Administrative Courts. The purpose of the move would be to improve timeliness of cases moving through the hearing process in compliance with federal regulations. CCLP’s advocacy led to the JBC’s request for future reporting by CDHS on several factors, including timeliness of hearings and independence of the “in-house” judges. Requiring CDHS to report on outcomes will ensure that this change is not detrimental to those beneficiaries who challenge county decisions that impact their SNAP benefits.

CCLP supported expanding access to healthy meals for all public school students through HB22-1414, Healthy Meals for All Public School Students, introduced late in the session after an earlier bill, SB22-087, stalled due to funding constraints. Led by Hunger Free Colorado, the House bill – passed but not yet signed by the Governor – is funded through a referred measure that closes a tax loophole affecting only those earners who make over $300,000 a year.

Also noteworthy in the fight against hunger are House Bills 1364 and 1380, led by our partner organizations Hunger Free Colorado and Blueprint to End Hunger. HB22-1364 would renew grants to food banks. HB22-1380 makes a number of improvements to SNAP, expanding access through small retailers and farmers markets, and improving technology to manage SNAP applications and caseload. There is new emphasis on locally grown food, fresh food, and culturally relevant food.

Income

The groundbreaking Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) bill HB22-1259 calls for a 10% increase and annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the approximately 14,000 families on TANF. This bill’s approximately $20,000,000 – $28,000,000 annual cost is paid for with American Rescue Plan funds, TANF current block grant allocation and county and state TANF reserves, as well as Unclaimed Property Funds, minimizing the fiscal impact on counties. This bill has been through over two-dozen changes, in part based on County concerns. This bill too now heads to the Governor.

HB1259 also features important provisions to lower sanctions, standardize exemptions from work requirements and from the 60-month time, direct the State Board of Human Service to redesign the “welfare to work offramp” to avoid sudden loss of benefits, and expand outreach and parent input into the program design.

CCLP has continually monitored the efficacy of the Employment Support Services Emergency Fund created as HB19-1107 in 2019, that will expire on 6/30/22. During its 3-year existence the $250,000 per year program has helped 1474 people in 60 different counties who had incomes below the Federal Poverty Level with an average need of $293. We have been the lead organization on the renewal bill, HB22-1230. The bill has passed the legislature and awaits the governor’s signature.

CCLP is collaborating with the Office of the Future of Work at CDLE and representing the Support Services Committee of Skills2Compete on the Digital Equity Subcommittee. We have now been contracted with this Office to conduct community listening sessions and interviews through June 30 to obtain stakeholder perspectives about digital inclusion. CCLP’s Skills 2 Compete Coalition is significantly involved and has influenced the drafting of Senate Bill 140 which includes:

  • expansion of work-based learning, digital inclusion, and digital navigators
  • the addition of English language instruction and mobile platforms to help workers learn specific work-related English, to help them get and advance in their jobs
  • a task force to address the transferability of foreign education credentials under DORA licensing requirements.

In 2013, CCLP ran HB14-1085 to provide funding for Adult Education Workforce Partnerships. At that time, Colorado was the only state in the union to not provide any state funding for adults working to complete high school or to learn English. Ongoing state funding is still less than $1 million per year to serve the more than 300,000 Colorado adults which lack a high school diploma or equivalency diploma. Colorado also has more than 300,000 adults who are not fluent in English. Some one-time funding was added in bills last year and this year.

This year CCLP, in our work with Skills2Compete, joined Spring Institute, libraries, and other Adult Education providers to amend HB22-1009, which sought to renew a “pay for performance” approach to granting diplomas which had passed in 2019, and whose requirements made most existing adult education programs ineligible.  According to a Colorado Department of Education, only 50 people obtain a high school diploma last year through the program. Two private companies had collected 80% of the $800,000 in funding under the bill, primarily as payment for partial credits. Participating libraries and community colleges found the funding was depleted before they could apply for reimbursement. CCLP fought for demographic reporting on who was served through the bill, and a change in the funding formula if the program was renewed. This bill ultimately died in appropriations. We will continue to seek a more long-term state investment for those closed out of jobs or promotions due to lack of a high school diploma, or due to not being fluent in English.

CCLP also met with a group of bankruptcy attorneys hoping to modernize and update statuary exemptions from debt collections. Of particular interest to CCLP was the expansion of the definition of “house” to include other dwellings such as RVs, vans, buses and campers. It would also increase the value of a home protected from the current $75,000 to $250,000 in equity to better reflect today’s prices and home value. For older Coloradans and people with disabilities, the exemption for one’s home would increase from $105,000 to $350,000. It would also allow exemption of up to $5000 in emergency savings, UI benefits in their entirety, HSAs, and “any” child tax credit to reflect the new state child tax credit. That bill, SB22-086, was recently signed into law.

CCLP continues to support a fairer tax system. Colorado took a one-year temporary half-step away from the current regressive structure of our TABOR rebate mechanism tiers — in which the wealthiest Coloradans get higher TABOR rebates than low-income Coloradans — with SB22-233. It authorizes flat rebates of $400 per individual, $800 per couple. By the state’s own figures, Coloradans with the lowest incomes — under $10,000 — pay a higher portion of their income in taxes than the wealthiest Coloradans. We joined Colorado Fiscal Institute and Bell Policy Center in testifying against two bills — HB22-1021 and HB22-1125 — which proposed lowering the state income tax rate. We particularly oppose tax cuts like reducing the income tax rate, as roughly one-half of Coloradans (and most older Coloradans) earn too little to owe income taxes (though still must pay many other taxes and fees), and thus receive no benefit. In fact, this population loses part or all of any TABOR refund, while the wealthiest receive the largest reduction under this regressive approach to tax cutting. We anticipate working with Colorado Fiscal Institute and the Bell to oppose a similar measure on the ballot this fall.

Health

HB22-1224: Public Benefits Theft, developed by CCLP in response to a recent Colorado Supreme Court decision, heightens the intent standard used when recipients of public benefits — for health, food, housing and income — are prosecuted for alleged theft. We are happy to announce that this bill not only passed but has already been signed into law by Governor Polis.

Some of the language initially planned for that bill — clarifying that the value of the theft was limited to benefits for which the person was not eligible — was adopted into the expansive criminal justice reform bill, HB22-1257. That bill, too, was signed into law in April.

In partnership with House Majority Leader Lontine and the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative, CCLP developed a bill that requires healthcare sharing arrangements operating in Colorado to report annually to the Division of Insurance. These entities have plan structures that mimic insurance, including premiums, deductibles and cost-sharing, but provide no guarantee of payment, do not cover pre-existing conditions, typically provide no coverage for behavioral health, and may deny payment when a condition is said to violate moral or religious precepts. HB22-1269 has now passed and is on its way to the Governor. (HB22-1198, a competing bill that would have created a safe harbor from regulation for these entities, was killed in its initial committee.)

On its own and in conjunction with behavioral health advocates, CCLP was able to get several amendments — among the many offered and approved — added to the Behavioral Health Administration bill, HB22-1278. The BHA will transform the Colorado system, bringing together federal block grants and state funding, creating regional behavioral health entities to administer funds and enroll providers, and establishing care coordination. That system aims to align with but remain separate from Medicaid and questions remain about how this will affect the care Medicaid enrollees receive. This bill has passed and is headed to the Governor’s desk.

CCLP was involved in several successful efforts around bills that involved hospital and drug pricing.

We successfully testified in support of HB22-1285, a bill that would prohibit collection actions when a hospital is non-compliant with federal price transparency requirements. A February survey found that most hospitals have yet to comply with the federal law, and 16 of the 17 Colorado hospitals surveyed were only partially in compliance.

We also testified in favor of HB22-1122, to prohibit practices by pharmacy benefit managers which disadvantaged Coloradans who qualified for discounted prices under the federal 340B program.

Finally, we testified in favor of a bill aligning the federal No Surprises Act with our state balance-billing law. That bill, HB22-1284, led by the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative, establishes the federal protections as a floor and attempts to preserve stronger protections that are in state law.

All three of these bills passed and are headed to the Governor.

CCLP engaged with other stakeholders on development of HB22-1325: Primary Care Alternative Payment Models, a bill which creates guardrails for the Alternative Payment Methodologies now being developed for commercial and public health plans. The bill establishes timelines for developing quality measures and aims to prevent APMs from disadvantaging populations that are historically underserved and underdiagnosed. This bill now awaits the governor’s signature as well.

CCLP participated in the steering committee for “Cover all Coloradans,” a bill that extends CHP+ coverage to pregnant people without documentation, and extends state-funded Medicaid to children who are undocumented. A Senate Amendment also eliminated premium co-pays for children on the Child Health Plan to eliminate barriers. HB22-1289 has passed as well and we eagerly anticipate the governor signing the groundbreaking bill into law.

CCLP worked with the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing to improve oversight of the state’s Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), capitated programs that provide an expansive set of services to keep people at home and in the community. CCLP played a major role in 2014-15 during the conversion of Colorado’s main PACE provider, InnovAge, to for-profit status, and raised red flags at that time regarding the need for more oversight of entities that serve this vulnerable population. SB22-203 awaits the Governor’s signature.

In closing…

We are grateful to those who stand steadfast with us against poverty in Colorado, and to those who support the work of this organization. We do not (and could not) do this work alone. We are particularly grateful to those bold legislators who sponsored and fought for the rights of so many Coloradans. Alas, the work never truly ends! As this Legislative Session draws to close, CCLP now shifts its focus to implementation. This can involve rulemaking, education and outreach, informally tracking funding and program implementation and impact, as well as serving on committees charged with  . As needed, our legal team will also identify opportunities to improve enforcement of rights created by 2022 and earlier legislation. Simultaneously, we will be working in coalitions and with partner organizations to begin work on our 2023 Legislative Agenda.

 

 

Recent articles

HEALTH:
HEALTH FIRST COLORADO (MEDICAID)

Health First Colorado is the name given to Colorado’s Medicaid program. Medicaid provides public, low-cost health insurance to qualifying adults and children. It is an entitlement program funded by the federal, state, and county governments and is administered by counties in Colorado. Those who are required to pay must pay a small co-pay when receiving certain health care services.

State Department: Department of Health Care Policy and Financing

Eligibility: Most adults 18 to 64 are eligible for Medicaid in Colorado if their household income is at or below 133% of the federal poverty limit (FPL). Pregnant women are eligible with incomes of up to 195% FPL, while children under 18 may be eligible if the live in a household with income at or below 142% FPL. Some adults over 65 may also be eligible for Medicaid.

Program Benefits: Through Medicaid, low-income Coloradans are eligible for a range of health care services at little to not cost. Services provided include doctors visits, prescription drugs, mental health services, and dental care. Co-pays for certain individuals may be needed for certain services.

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds our Medicaid program through state and federal dollars. Medicaid is an entitlement program, which means that all who are eligible for Medicaid can access the program, regardless of the funding level in a given year. This does not mean that it is always easy to access Medicaid, even when eligible. And since the program is administered by counties, funding levels for county staff and other administrative roles can make it easier or harder for Coloradans to access the program. On top of this, not all medical providers accept Medicaid which limits the ability of Coloradans to seek health services even if enrolled, such as if the nearest provider is a 2+ hour drive away.

Note: This data is from before the pandemic and does not reflect changes in enrollment rules during the COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 89.0% of the population at or below 133% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for Medicaid) were enrolled in Medicaid in Colorado.

FOOD SECURITY:
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP)

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP helps low-income Coloradans purchase food by providing individuals and families with a monthly cash benefit that can be used to buy certain foods. SNAP is an entitlement program that is funded by the federal and state governments and administered by counties in Colorado.

State Department: Department of Human Services

Eligibility: Currently, Coloradans qualify for SNAP if they have incomes below 200% FPL, are unemployed or work part-time or receive other forms of assistance such as TANF, among other eligibility criteria. Income eligibility for SNAP was different during the study period of this report than today—it was 130% FPL back in 2019 for example. The US Department of Agriculture uses the population at or below 125% FPL when calculating the Program Access Index (or PAI) for SNAP. We follow this practice in our analysis despite Colorado currently having a higher income eligibility threshold.

Program Benefits: SNAP participants receive a monthly SNAP benefit that is determined by the number of people in their household and their income. Benefit amounts decrease as income increases, helping households avoid a sudden loss of SNAP when their incomes increase, even by a minor amount. Benefits are provided to an Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card that can be used to purchase eligible food items, such as fruits and vegetables; meat, poultry, and fish; dairy products; and breads and cereals. Other items, such as foods that are hot at their point of sale, are not allowable purchases under current SNAP rules.

Program Funding and Access: SNAP, like Medicaid, is a federal entitlement program. This means that Colorado must serve any Coloradan who is eligible for the program. As such, funding should not be a limit to how many Coloradans can be served by the program. However, funding for administration of SNAP at the state and county level can limit the ability of county human service departments to enroll those who are eligible. Other program rules and administrative barriers can make it difficult for Coloradans to receive the benefits they are legally entitled to receive.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 61.1% of the population at or below 125% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for SNAP) were enrolled.

FOOD SECURITY:
SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS AND CHILDREN (WIC)

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, also know as WIC, provides healthcare and nutritional support to low-income Coloradans who are pregnant, recently pregnant, breastfeeding, and to children under 5 who are nutritionally at risk based on a nutrition assessment.

State Department: Department of Public Health and Environment

Eligibility: To participate in WIC you must be pregnant, pregnant in the last six months, breastfeeding a baby under 1 year of age, or a child under the age of 5. Coloradans do not need to be U.S. citizens to be eligible for WIC. In terms of income, households cannot have incomes that exceed 185% FPL. Families who are enrolled in SNAP, TANF, Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), or Medicaid are automatically eligible for WIC. Regardless of gender, any parents, foster parents, or caregivers are able to apply for and use WIC services for eligible children.

Program Benefits: WIC provides a range of services to young children and their parents. These include funds to purchase healthy, fresh foods; breastfeeding support; personalized nutrition education and shopping tips; and referrals to health care and other services participants may be eligible for.

Program Funding and Access: WIC is funded by the US Department of Agriculture. The state uses these federal funds to contract with local providers, known as WIC Clinics. In most cases, these are county public health agencies, but that is not the case in all Colorado counties. Some WIC Clinics cover multiple counties, while others are served by multiple clinics. Private non-profit providers are also eligible to be selected as a WIC Clinic.

Statewide Program Access 2015-17: Between 2015 and 2017, an average of 52.2% of the population eligible for WIC were enrolled in the program in Colorado.

Financial Security:
Colorado Works

Colorado Works is the name given to Colorado’s program for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF. It is an employment program that supports families with dependent children on their path to self-sufficiency. Participants can receive cash assistance, schooling, workforce development and skills training depending on the services available in their county.

State Department: Department of Human Services

Eligibility: In general, Coloradans are eligible to enroll in TANF if they are a resident of Colorado, have one or more children under the age of 18 or pregnant, and have very low or no income. For example, to be eligible to receive a basic cash assistance grant through TANF, a single-parent of one child could not earn more than $331 per month, with some exclusions—and would only receive $440 per month (as of 2022). That said, there are other services provided by counties through TANF that those with incomes as high as $75,000 may be eligible for. In addition to these, participants in TANF are required to work or be pursuing an eligible “work activity” or work-related activity. Any eligible individual can only receive assistance if they have not previously been enrolled in TANF for a cumulative amount of time of more than 60 months—this is a lifetime limit that does not reset. Counties may have additional requirements and offer benefits that are not available in other counties in Colorado.

Program Benefits:  While the exact benefits that one is eligible for under TANF can vary, all qualified participants are eligible to receive a monthly cash payment, call basic cash assistance. Other than cash assistance, counties are have a lot of choice in how to use their TANF funding; generally a use of TANF funds is appropriate so long as it advances one or more of the four purposes of the program: (1) provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of their relatives; (2) end the dependence of needy families on government benefits by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage; (3) prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and (4) encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.

It is important to note that those eligible for TANF are also eligible for many of the other programs we’ve included in this report, such as SNAP, Medicaid, and CCCAP.

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds its TANF program through funds received from the federal government through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant. Most of the federal funds are allocated by the state to counties, which are required to provide a 20% match of state funding. Federal and state rules allow the state and counties to retain a portion of unspent funds in a TANF reserve.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 50.7% of the population at or below 100% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for TANF) were enrolled in TANF in Colorado.

EARLY LEARNING:
COLORADO CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CCCAP)

The Colorado Child Care Assistance Program provides child care assistance to low-income families and caregivers living in Colorado in the form of reduced payments for child care. It is a program funded by the federal, state, and county governments and is administered by counties in Colorado. The share owed by parents/caregivers is determined on a sliding scale based on the family’s income.

State Department: Department of Early Childhood Education

Eligibility: Counties set eligibility for families separately, but must serve families with incomes at or below 185% of the Federal Poverty Limit. Families accepted to the program are no longer eligible once their income exceeds 85% of the state median income. Parents or caregivers must be employed, searching for work, or engaged in another approved activity to be eligible for CCCAP. Parents and caregivers enrolled in Colorado Works (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF) or in the child welfare system are also eligible to participate in CCCAP. Generally, CCCAP serves families with children under 13, although children as old as 19 may be eligible under certain circumstances.

Program Benefits: If a family is eligible for CCCAP and has income, they may likely have to pay a portion of their child’s or children’s child care costs each month. The amount that families owe is based on their gross income, number of household members, and the number of children in child care in the household. As such, households tend not to experience a benefit cliff with CCCAP when they see their incomes increase

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds the CCCAP program using federal dollars it receives from the Child Care and Development Block Grant program. The state allocates federal and state funds to counties using a formula that takes into account factors like current caseloads and the number of eligible residents. Assistance is available until the county’s funds are spent, so the number of families that can be served is often a function of how much funding is available and the income and composition of the household that applies. It is not uncommon for counties to overspend or underspend their allocations of funds. The state reallocates unspent funds from counties who underspent to those who overspent. While underspending could indicate a problem with the way a county administers its CCCAP program, it could just as likely be a sign that there are few providers in the county who participate in CCCAP—or a lack of providers generally.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 10.8% of the population at or below 165% of FPL and younger than age 13 (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for CCCAP) were enrolled in CCCAP.

Housing:
HUD rental assistance programs

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has three housing assistance programs that we look at together: Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8), Project-based Section 8, and Public Housing. In Colorado, these programs provided assistance to over 90% of the households who received federal housing assistance from all HUD programs. Through federally funded, local or regional public housing agencies (PHAs) are the agencies that administer these programs, through not all are available in all counties. These are not the only programs available in Colorado that assist households afford the cost of housing, such as units funded through federal and state tax credit programs.

State Department: Department of Local Affairs

Eligibility: Generally, households with incomes under 50% of the area median income (AMI) of the county they live in are eligible for these rental assistance programs, although PHAs have discretion to select households with incomes at higher percentages of AMI. That said, HUD requires that 75% of new vouchers issued through the Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8 program in a given year are targeted to households with incomes at or below 30% of AMI. PHAs are also able to create criteria that give priority to certain types of households who are on waiting lists for these programs.

Program Benefits: These rental assistance programs help households afford the cost of housing by reducing their housing costs to around 30% of their household income. In the case of the Housing Choice Voucher program, the PHA pays the voucher holder’s landlord the remaining portion of the rent.

Program Funding and Access: Funding and access are both challenges for these rental assistance programs. In addition to limitations on the number of public housing units or housing vouchers a PHA can manage or issue, lack of funding compared to the need constrains the ability of PHAs to assist low-income households. In 2020, Coloradans were on waitlists for Housing Choice Vouchers for an average of 17 months. Waitlists also exist for the other rental assistance programs.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 21.1% of renter households with incomes at or below 50% AMI (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for HUD rental assistance programs) were living in subsidized housing.