Jun 5, 2026

Karly Kaufman serves as Communications Manager for CCLP. Staff page ›

Recent articles

2026 Legislative wrap-up, part 1

Part 1 of CCLP's 2026 legislative wrap-up, including advocacy work, policy priorities, and advancing economic justice.

CCLP testifies in support of Colorado families

Charles Brennan provided testimony in support of House Bill 26-1221, which would have scaled back two corporate tax breaks to go to a new tax credit to help families with kids. This bill was one of four bills a part of Colorado Fiscal Institute’s fiscal policy package, and one of CCLP’s priorities. Unfortunately, the bill was postponed indefinitely.

CCLP testifies against bill that could harm low-wage workers

Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, provided testimony against House Bill 26-1327, which aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level.

2026 Legislative wrap-up, part 2

by | Jun 5, 2026

Click here to read our 2026 Legislative wrap-up, part 1.

Defending public programs

Another policy priority for CCLP was on defending public programs. We supported functional, person-centered public programs that improve health, meet changing needs, support the workforce, and lift Colorado’s economy. There were six bills that fit this policy area including HB26-1096, Colorado Medicaid Access to Primary Care Services, and HB26-1327, Large Employer Worker Health-Care Support.

HB26-1096 would have allowed Direct Primary Care providers to charge Medicaid patients hundreds of dollars for services that are otherwise free. Bethany Pray, Chief Legal and Policy Officer at CCLP, originally provided testimony in opposition to the bill at the beginning of the session. After proposing amendments to the bill, along with partners in Colorado Medicaid managed care and other carriers, CCLP changed our position to amend. However, due to these added amendments, proponents of the bill postponed it indefinitely.

HB26-1327 aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level. Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, met with sponsors repeatedly to propose amendments and uplift concerns, as well as testified in opposition of the bill. It was ultimately postponed indefinitely.

CCLP also worked on and supported other bills that did not need testimony, including HB26-1235, Updates to Medicaid and HB26-1429, County Administration Public Assistance Programs. For HB26-1235, Pray met with the Department of Health Care & Policy Financing, the administrators of Medicaid in Colorado, to provide legal analysis and edit amendment language to ensure implementation of HR 1 data will be documented. Pray also negotiated throughout the session with the Governor’s Office, agency staff, and counties on HB26-1429. Several of the suggestions we made were included in the bill. Both bills passed and were signed into law by Governor Polis.

Strengthening consumer rights

Our third and last policy priority area focused on protecting community members from exploitative business practices and working to break cycles of debt and poverty. From health to wages to price changes, CCLP played an integral part in several bills focusing on consumer protections. HB26-1267 and SB26-140, two of our priority bills, were central to this fight.

HB26-1267, also known as the Medical Debt Protection Act, would have prohibited medical creditors from collecting unpaid medical debts by pursuing non-patients, garnishing wages, seeking arrest or detainment, and more. CCLP proudly supported the bill. We wrote, led work on amendments, and provided testimony — Pray focused on extraordinary collections, while CCLP Litigation Director Annie Martínez dispelled misinformation about medical debt. Martínez also spoke at the Rally Against Medical Debt on May 8, 2026, stating medical debt is what happens when health care is treated like a market commodity instead of a human need. The bill will be back for the 2027 legislative session, with Javier Mabrey returning as its primary sponsor.

SB26-140 would have prevented Colorado Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB) from reviewing the cost of hundreds of commonly prescribed medications that Coloradans struggle to afford every day. Pray provided testimony against the bill, arguing that the creation of the PDAB was a first in the nation opportunity for a patient-informed, deliberate, data-driven and very public process to determine if a drug is affordable for Coloradans. We were involved in drafting and reviewing amendments, and the bill was ultimately postponed indefinitely. Unfortunately, this effort is likely to return in the 2027 legislative session, driven by Big Pharma industry leaders.

The opposite of SB26-140 was SB26-138, Reducing Administrative Burdens on Health Care. CCLP took an amend position because we prioritize reducing administrative and economic burdens for patients, as mentioned by Pray in her testimony. We, along with Colorado Consumer Health Initiative, pushed proponents of the bill to make several amendments that better protect consumers and Hospital Discounted Care. The bill was signed into law.

CCLP also took a position on three bills focused on financial exploitation of various kinds, including HB26-1012, Consumer Protections to Promote Fair Market Pricing, HB26-1046, Regulated Earned-Wage Access Services, and HB26-1210, Prohibit Surveillance Price & Wage Setting. Income and Housing Policy Director Charles Brennan gave testimony for HB26-1012 which would have required delivery service apps, like Instacart or Grubhub, to provide consumers with the prices of the delivered goods and the goods available at a store. It also would have prohibited unfair or deceptive trade practices by charging unreasonably excessive prices for goods and serves. Brennan argued to restore basic market fairness and price transparency for Colorado consumers. Unfortunately, the bill was postponed indefinitely on March 3, 2026.

Chris Nelson, CCLP’s Research & Policy Analyst, testified in opposition to HB26-1046, an industry-supported bill offering inadequate regulation of Earned-Wage Access providers, putting vulnerable Coloradans at risk of ongoing financial exploitation. The bill was laid over. Brennan also provided testimony in support of the HB26-1210, arguing businesses no longer compete for who offers the best prices or wages, but who has the most data and sophisticated algorithms. The bill would have prohibited businesses from using surveillance data and algorithms to set individualized prices for consumers or individualized wages for workers, while still allowing for standard pricing, discounting, and loyalty program practices. Unfortunately, Governor Polis vetoed the bill for the second year in a row.

Other bills

CCLP also took positions on bills that fit into more than one of, or were outside of, our legislative priority platform areas. This included legislation with legal and constitutional barriers, and as well as language access barriers.

As federal actions wreak havoc on communities across the country, CCLP supported bills focused on protecting Coloradans’ constitutional rights, including SB26-005, Rights Violations in Immigration Enforcement Remedy and SB26-176, State Remedies for Constitutional Rights Violation. SB26-005 would have protected Coloradans rights in civil immigration enforcement. The bill passed, but the Governor vetoed it despite significant support from the legislature. SB26-176 was then introduced to allow Coloradans to hold federal actors accountable in constitutional rights violations. Despite strong testimony from Martínez and other constitutional scholars, SB26-176 was defeated by opponents’ coordinated campaign to exaggerate and share misinformation.

Other legal legislation included HB26-1322, Civil Action for Conversion Therapy Survivors, which removes the statute of limitations for conversion therapy survivors, ensuring they are legally protected. Martínez provided testimony in support of the bill, arguing that trauma does not always reveal itself on a predictable timeline. The bill was signed into law and goes into effect on July 1, 2026.

As advocates of language access, CCLP opposed HB26-1201, Homeowners’ Preferred Language Notice to Homeowners’ Association, which would have required owners to provide “proof of need” prior to Homeowners Associations providing correspondence and notices in a language other than English. CCLP Community Engagement Director Morgan Turner testified against the bill, arguing it would have been a step back for language access. Thankfully, the bill was postponed indefinitely.

Looking to the future

CCLP is already planning for the 2027 legislative session. An effort we will once again be leading is a policy called ROBIN Alerts, developed by CCLP Policy Advocate Milena Tayah. Named after Tayah’s grandmother who passed away due to an unplanned power outage, ROBIN Alerts proposes a standard minimum communications framework for utility providers across Colorado to alert electricity customers in case of power outages. After significant work on the policy this year, CCLP withdrew ROBIN Alerts from the 2026 session with the intent to have the bill introduced at the beginning of next year’s legislative session.

Conclusion

In addition to the legislative session, CCLP continued to work on other policies at the state and federal level. We provided two public comments to the federal government, testified and gave comments to the Public Utilities Commission in Colorado, made a statement on the federal actions in Minnesota, and continued to convene with the Medicaid and SNAP work requirements group to address how HR 1’s change in eligibility requirements impacts beneficiaries in Colorado.

This legislative session was nothing short of surprises, from great wins to some big losses. Through it all, CCLP was on the frontline advocating for the rights of every Coloradan. (Shoutout to our incredibly dedicated policy team: Charles Brennan, Annie Martínez, Chris Nelson, Bethany Pray, Chaer Robert, Milena Tayah, Morgan Turner, Katherine Wallat, and Laura Ware!) Even though the session is over, we will continue to monitor the bills that passed or signed into law to ensure implementation is successful.

This wrap-up provides information on some of the bills we focused on, but you can see all our bill positions in our 2026 bill tracker.

Recent articles

2026 Legislative wrap-up, part 1

Part 1 of CCLP's 2026 legislative wrap-up, including advocacy work, policy priorities, and advancing economic justice.

CCLP testifies in support of Colorado families

Charles Brennan provided testimony in support of House Bill 26-1221, which would have scaled back two corporate tax breaks to go to a new tax credit to help families with kids. This bill was one of four bills a part of Colorado Fiscal Institute’s fiscal policy package, and one of CCLP’s priorities. Unfortunately, the bill was postponed indefinitely.

CCLP testifies against bill that could harm low-wage workers

Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, provided testimony against House Bill 26-1327, which aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level.

HEALTH:
HEALTH FIRST COLORADO (MEDICAID)

Health First Colorado is the name given to Colorado’s Medicaid program. Medicaid provides public, low-cost health insurance to qualifying adults and children. It is an entitlement program funded by the federal, state, and county governments and is administered by counties in Colorado. Those who are required to pay must pay a small co-pay when receiving certain health care services.

State Department: Department of Health Care Policy and Financing

Eligibility: Most adults 18 to 64 are eligible for Medicaid in Colorado if their household income is at or below 133% of the federal poverty limit (FPL). Pregnant women are eligible with incomes of up to 195% FPL, while children under 18 may be eligible if the live in a household with income at or below 142% FPL. Some adults over 65 may also be eligible for Medicaid.

Program Benefits: Through Medicaid, low-income Coloradans are eligible for a range of health care services at little to not cost. Services provided include doctors visits, prescription drugs, mental health services, and dental care. Co-pays for certain individuals may be needed for certain services.

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds our Medicaid program through state and federal dollars. Medicaid is an entitlement program, which means that all who are eligible for Medicaid can access the program, regardless of the funding level in a given year. This does not mean that it is always easy to access Medicaid, even when eligible. And since the program is administered by counties, funding levels for county staff and other administrative roles can make it easier or harder for Coloradans to access the program. On top of this, not all medical providers accept Medicaid which limits the ability of Coloradans to seek health services even if enrolled, such as if the nearest provider is a 2+ hour drive away.

Note: This data is from before the pandemic and does not reflect changes in enrollment rules during the COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 89.0% of the population at or below 133% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for Medicaid) were enrolled in Medicaid in Colorado.

FOOD SECURITY:
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP)

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP helps low-income Coloradans purchase food by providing individuals and families with a monthly cash benefit that can be used to buy certain foods. SNAP is an entitlement program that is funded by the federal and state governments and administered by counties in Colorado.

State Department: Department of Human Services

Eligibility: Currently, Coloradans qualify for SNAP if they have incomes below 200% FPL, are unemployed or work part-time or receive other forms of assistance such as TANF, among other eligibility criteria. Income eligibility for SNAP was different during the study period of this report than today—it was 130% FPL back in 2019 for example. The US Department of Agriculture uses the population at or below 125% FPL when calculating the Program Access Index (or PAI) for SNAP. We follow this practice in our analysis despite Colorado currently having a higher income eligibility threshold.

Program Benefits: SNAP participants receive a monthly SNAP benefit that is determined by the number of people in their household and their income. Benefit amounts decrease as income increases, helping households avoid a sudden loss of SNAP when their incomes increase, even by a minor amount. Benefits are provided to an Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card that can be used to purchase eligible food items, such as fruits and vegetables; meat, poultry, and fish; dairy products; and breads and cereals. Other items, such as foods that are hot at their point of sale, are not allowable purchases under current SNAP rules.

Program Funding and Access: SNAP, like Medicaid, is a federal entitlement program. This means that Colorado must serve any Coloradan who is eligible for the program. As such, funding should not be a limit to how many Coloradans can be served by the program. However, funding for administration of SNAP at the state and county level can limit the ability of county human service departments to enroll those who are eligible. Other program rules and administrative barriers can make it difficult for Coloradans to receive the benefits they are legally entitled to receive.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 61.1% of the population at or below 125% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for SNAP) were enrolled.

FOOD SECURITY:
SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS AND CHILDREN (WIC)

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, also know as WIC, provides healthcare and nutritional support to low-income Coloradans who are pregnant, recently pregnant, breastfeeding, and to children under 5 who are nutritionally at risk based on a nutrition assessment.

State Department: Department of Public Health and Environment

Eligibility: To participate in WIC you must be pregnant, pregnant in the last six months, breastfeeding a baby under 1 year of age, or a child under the age of 5. Coloradans do not need to be U.S. citizens to be eligible for WIC. In terms of income, households cannot have incomes that exceed 185% FPL. Families who are enrolled in SNAP, TANF, Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), or Medicaid are automatically eligible for WIC. Regardless of gender, any parents, foster parents, or caregivers are able to apply for and use WIC services for eligible children.

Program Benefits: WIC provides a range of services to young children and their parents. These include funds to purchase healthy, fresh foods; breastfeeding support; personalized nutrition education and shopping tips; and referrals to health care and other services participants may be eligible for.

Program Funding and Access: WIC is funded by the US Department of Agriculture. The state uses these federal funds to contract with local providers, known as WIC Clinics. In most cases, these are county public health agencies, but that is not the case in all Colorado counties. Some WIC Clinics cover multiple counties, while others are served by multiple clinics. Private non-profit providers are also eligible to be selected as a WIC Clinic.

Statewide Program Access 2015-17: Between 2015 and 2017, an average of 52.2% of the population eligible for WIC were enrolled in the program in Colorado.

Financial Security:
Colorado Works

Colorado Works is the name given to Colorado’s program for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF. It is an employment program that supports families with dependent children on their path to self-sufficiency. Participants can receive cash assistance, schooling, workforce development and skills training depending on the services available in their county.

State Department: Department of Human Services

Eligibility: In general, Coloradans are eligible to enroll in TANF if they are a resident of Colorado, have one or more children under the age of 18 or pregnant, and have very low or no income. For example, to be eligible to receive a basic cash assistance grant through TANF, a single-parent of one child could not earn more than $331 per month, with some exclusions—and would only receive $440 per month (as of 2022). That said, there are other services provided by counties through TANF that those with incomes as high as $75,000 may be eligible for. In addition to these, participants in TANF are required to work or be pursuing an eligible “work activity” or work-related activity. Any eligible individual can only receive assistance if they have not previously been enrolled in TANF for a cumulative amount of time of more than 60 months—this is a lifetime limit that does not reset. Counties may have additional requirements and offer benefits that are not available in other counties in Colorado.

Program Benefits:  While the exact benefits that one is eligible for under TANF can vary, all qualified participants are eligible to receive a monthly cash payment, call basic cash assistance. Other than cash assistance, counties are have a lot of choice in how to use their TANF funding; generally a use of TANF funds is appropriate so long as it advances one or more of the four purposes of the program: (1) provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of their relatives; (2) end the dependence of needy families on government benefits by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage; (3) prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and (4) encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.

It is important to note that those eligible for TANF are also eligible for many of the other programs we’ve included in this report, such as SNAP, Medicaid, and CCCAP.

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds its TANF program through funds received from the federal government through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant. Most of the federal funds are allocated by the state to counties, which are required to provide a 20% match of state funding. Federal and state rules allow the state and counties to retain a portion of unspent funds in a TANF reserve.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 50.7% of the population at or below 100% of FPL (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for TANF) were enrolled in TANF in Colorado.

EARLY LEARNING:
COLORADO CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CCCAP)

The Colorado Child Care Assistance Program provides child care assistance to low-income families and caregivers living in Colorado in the form of reduced payments for child care. It is a program funded by the federal, state, and county governments and is administered by counties in Colorado. The share owed by parents/caregivers is determined on a sliding scale based on the family’s income.

State Department: Department of Early Childhood Education

Eligibility: Counties set eligibility for families separately, but must serve families with incomes at or below 185% of the Federal Poverty Limit. Families accepted to the program are no longer eligible once their income exceeds 85% of the state median income. Parents or caregivers must be employed, searching for work, or engaged in another approved activity to be eligible for CCCAP. Parents and caregivers enrolled in Colorado Works (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF) or in the child welfare system are also eligible to participate in CCCAP. Generally, CCCAP serves families with children under 13, although children as old as 19 may be eligible under certain circumstances.

Program Benefits: If a family is eligible for CCCAP and has income, they may likely have to pay a portion of their child’s or children’s child care costs each month. The amount that families owe is based on their gross income, number of household members, and the number of children in child care in the household. As such, households tend not to experience a benefit cliff with CCCAP when they see their incomes increase

Program Funding and Access: Colorado funds the CCCAP program using federal dollars it receives from the Child Care and Development Block Grant program. The state allocates federal and state funds to counties using a formula that takes into account factors like current caseloads and the number of eligible residents. Assistance is available until the county’s funds are spent, so the number of families that can be served is often a function of how much funding is available and the income and composition of the household that applies. It is not uncommon for counties to overspend or underspend their allocations of funds. The state reallocates unspent funds from counties who underspent to those who overspent. While underspending could indicate a problem with the way a county administers its CCCAP program, it could just as likely be a sign that there are few providers in the county who participate in CCCAP—or a lack of providers generally.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 10.8% of the population at or below 165% of FPL and younger than age 13 (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for CCCAP) were enrolled in CCCAP.

Housing:
HUD rental assistance programs

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has three housing assistance programs that we look at together: Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8), Project-based Section 8, and Public Housing. In Colorado, these programs provided assistance to over 90% of the households who received federal housing assistance from all HUD programs. Through federally funded, local or regional public housing agencies (PHAs) are the agencies that administer these programs, through not all are available in all counties. These are not the only programs available in Colorado that assist households afford the cost of housing, such as units funded through federal and state tax credit programs.

State Department: Department of Local Affairs

Eligibility: Generally, households with incomes under 50% of the area median income (AMI) of the county they live in are eligible for these rental assistance programs, although PHAs have discretion to select households with incomes at higher percentages of AMI. That said, HUD requires that 75% of new vouchers issued through the Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8 program in a given year are targeted to households with incomes at or below 30% of AMI. PHAs are also able to create criteria that give priority to certain types of households who are on waiting lists for these programs.

Program Benefits: These rental assistance programs help households afford the cost of housing by reducing their housing costs to around 30% of their household income. In the case of the Housing Choice Voucher program, the PHA pays the voucher holder’s landlord the remaining portion of the rent.

Program Funding and Access: Funding and access are both challenges for these rental assistance programs. In addition to limitations on the number of public housing units or housing vouchers a PHA can manage or issue, lack of funding compared to the need constrains the ability of PHAs to assist low-income households. In 2020, Coloradans were on waitlists for Housing Choice Vouchers for an average of 17 months. Waitlists also exist for the other rental assistance programs.

Statewide Program Access 2015-19: Over the study period of this report, an average of 21.1% of renter households with incomes at or below 50% AMI (i.e., the population who is likely to be eligible for HUD rental assistance programs) were living in subsidized housing.