Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, provided testimony against House Bill 26-1327, which aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of constitutional rights in Colorado
Annie Martínez provided testimony in strong support of Senate Bill 26-176, which would have allowed Coloradans to hold federal actors accountable in constitutional rights violations.
Skills2Compete CO testifies in support of older workers
Chaer Robert provided testimony on behalf of Skills2Compete Colorado on House Bill 26-1010, Older Adult Support & Representation in the Workforce, which would increase participation, representation, and support for older adults in the workforce, beginning at 55 years of age.
CCLP testifies on reducing administrative burden on the health care industry
Bethany Pray provided testimony on Senate Bill 26-138, Reducing Administrative Burdens on Health Care. CCLP is in an amend position because we prioritize reducing administrative and economic burdens for patients.
CCLP testifies in support of medical debt protections

On Tuesday, March 31, 2026, Bethany Pray, Chief Legal and Policy Director at CCLP, provided testimony in support of House Bill 26-1267, Limitations on Collection Actions for Medical Debt. The bill would have increased medical debt protections for Coloradans. Unfortunately, the bill was postponed indefinitely in the House Health & Human Services Committee.
Madam Chair & Members of the Committee,
My name is Bethany Pray and I’m Chief Legal and Policy Officer at the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, a statewide anti-poverty organization that advances the rights of all Coloradans. I’m asking for your support today on HB26-1267. This policy, with the strike-below, bars only those collection methods that are most destructive to a household’s economic security and wellbeing, and that are here termed “extraordinary.”
Many providers never pursue extraordinary collections. Those who do—in recent history, that’s primarily nonprofit hospitals and UCHealth—can and should use routes to reimbursement that are more humane and support patients’ health. One such route is Hospital Discounted Care (HDC)[1], which requires screening for public programs for uninsured households, and provides a structure for manageable payment plans.
Unfortunately, too many patients never know what they qualify for. State data shows that screening data was not submitted or a final determination was unavailable for more than 150,000 patients in the last reported year. That’s a lot of potentially eligible Colorado patients falling through the cracks. How many ended up in collections, or having wages garnished? When wages are garnished, chances are good, according to ADP data, that they had household income between $20,000 and $60,000. These are not rich folks.
We want HDC to work better for patients and hospitals, and that’s why CCLP and other organizations came to the table and collaborated with the hospital association on SB24-116, to help hospitals enroll patients more quickly in Medicaid.
If screening was universal, or even close to universal, I might be persuaded that there are circumstances where these aggressive methods are needed. But we’re 150,000 patients away from universal screening.
Because of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, we face, as a state, the specter of tens of thousands of people shut off from coverage. Sending people to collections, garnishing wages, having attorneys tack on fees and court costs that cause debt to balloon—that is NOT the way to go. Enrollment in public programs and making best efforts to get people into payment plans: that is what is going to work for Colorado.
**********
