Commentary on the recent presidential executive orders and an assessment of executive orders as they arise and their impact on Coloradans.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of fair standards in mental health care
Andre Mansion provided testimony in support of House Bill 25-1002, Medical Necessity Determination Insurance Coverage. CCLP is in support of HB25-1002.
CCLP is leaving X
CCLP is leaving X due to it being a platform that actively fosters cruelty and disinformation, threatening and harming the communities we serve.
A letter from our CEO: December 2024
A final 2024 letter from our Chief Executive Officer, Lydia McCoy.
A letter to Senator Hickenlooper on current threats to Medicaid

Read our latest issue brief, the companion to the letter sent to Senator Hickenlooper below: Letter Addendum: The Impact of Republican Medicaid Proposals on Colorado.
Dear Senator John Hickenlooper:
Thank you for the opportunity to speak with your staff in D.C. on January 23, 2025 regarding the potential impacts of proposed Medicaid funding cuts. As an organization dedicated to combating poverty and fostering economic equity in Colorado, the Colorado Center on Law and Policy is deeply concerned about how these cuts would harm our state’s most vulnerable residents. Approximately one in four working households in Colorado cannot meet their basic needs, and many rely on programs like Medicaid, SNAP, and CHIP to navigate economic insecurity.[1]
We are focusing today on current threats to Medicaid and the impacts of those changes on Colorado specifically.
- TABOR Makes Colorado Uniquely Vulnerable: The Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights (TABOR) severely limits Colorado’s ability to fund our Medicaid program, resulting in below-average spending and outdated technology. Proposed changes could raise state costs by $1.7 billion, which is unsustainable under TABOR without deep cuts to coverage or other essential services.
- Medicaid “Unwind” Exposed Critical System Failures: Administrative issues during Colorado’s recent redetermination process caused thousands to lose coverage incorrectly, making Colorado one of the states with the highest coverage losses.[2] Medicaid enrollment dropped 83,000 below pre-pandemic levels for children and parent caretakers, highlighting system-wide vulnerabilities.
- Work Requirements Would Be Counterproductive: Nearly two-thirds of Medicaid recipients are already employed. Implementing work requirements would impose unnecessary administrative burdens on counties and put 542,000 Coloradans at risk of losing coverage, while failing to increase employment or reduce state spending.
- Funding Changes Would Cripple Medicaid’s Effectiveness: Converting Medicaid to block grants or per capita caps would disconnect funding from actual healthcare needs and costs. These changes would cut federal funding by $459-893 billion over nine years, preventing Medicaid from functioning as a safety net, particularly during economic downturns and public health emergencies.[3]
- Proposed Changes Would Harm Colorado’s Economy: The ACA Medicaid expansion was projected to boost Colorado’s economy by $8.53 billion by 2034/35 and has created over 31,000 jobs.[4] Federal cuts would reverse these gains, harming both healthcare access and economic growth.
Colorado Cannot Afford Federal Cuts to Medicaid
Although work requirements, per capita caps, block grant funding, or reductions to the federal match may be presented as technical changes, they would fundamentally alter the Medicaid program and Colorado’s economy. Medicaid is the largest source of federal funding coming into the states, and if that funding is significantly cut, state economic health will suffer – with potential negative impacts on the state’s credit rating, not to mention residents’ well-being.3 4
Thousands of Coloradans would lose affordable health insurance; providers would be overwhelmed with uninsured patients; clinics and hospitals that depend on Medicaid reimbursement could shut their doors. As governor of Colorado, you oversaw an expansion of Medicaid that resulted in our state’s uninsured rate dropping in half to 6.7% from 2013 to 2015.[5] This progress is at risk if any of these proposals pass.
While we understand that Senate Republicans are driving these proposed changes, we urge you to use your considerable influence to oppose the aforementioned “reforms” to Medicaid. The attached contains supporting data and information, and our staff would be glad to talk more with you and to provide additional research regarding Medicaid’s vital role in Colorado.
Sincerely,
Lydia McCoy
Chief Executive Officer
Colorado Center on Law and Policy
**********
[1] Kucklick, A. & Manzer, L. (2022). Overlooked & Undercounted: Coloradans Struggling to Make Ends Meet in 2019. Prepared for CCLP by Center for Women’s Welfare – Univ. of Washington School of Social Work. https://copolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/CO2019_Demo_Web.pdf.
[2] Bichal, R.E. (2024, July 11). Colorado Dropped Medicaid Enrollees as Red States Have, Alarming Advocates. KFF Health News. https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/colorado-medicaid-unwinding-blue-red-states/.
[3] Congressional Budget Office (2024, December 12). Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2025-2034. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60557.
[4] Brown, C., Fisher, S. & Resnick, P. (2016). Assessing the Economic and Budgetary Impact of Medicaid Expansion in Colorado: FY 2015-16 through FY 2034-35. Colorado Health Foundation. https://coloradohealth.org/sites/default/files/documents/2017-01/Medicaid_Expansion_Full_ONLINE_.PDF
[5] Colorado Health Access Survey (2023). 2023 Colorado Health Access Survey (CHAS): Insurance Coverage. Colorado Health Institute. https://www.coloradohealthinstitute.org/research/2023-chas-mental-health