Katherine Wallat, Legal Director at CCLP, provided testimony against House Bill 26-1327, which aimed to address the problem of large corporations relying on the state to provide health insurance by paying their workers low enough wages to enroll in Medicaid. CCLP agrees corporations should pay their fair share, but ultimately opposed the bill because of the harm it could cause workers perceived to use Medicaid due to their age, disability, or income level.
Recent articles
CCLP testifies in support of constitutional rights in Colorado
Annie Martínez provided testimony in strong support of Senate Bill 26-176, which would have allowed Coloradans to hold federal actors accountable in constitutional rights violations.
Skills2Compete CO testifies in support of older workers
Chaer Robert provided testimony on behalf of Skills2Compete Colorado on House Bill 26-1010, Older Adult Support & Representation in the Workforce, which would increase participation, representation, and support for older adults in the workforce, beginning at 55 years of age.
CCLP testifies on reducing administrative burden on the health care industry
Bethany Pray provided testimony on Senate Bill 26-138, Reducing Administrative Burdens on Health Care. CCLP is in an amend position because we prioritize reducing administrative and economic burdens for patients.
New CCLP Issue Brief released: Life after Chevron

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year to overturn the Chevron doctrine marked one of the most consequential shifts in administrative law in decades.
For over 40 years, courts deferred to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes, allowing expert regulators to shape policies that govern health care, workers’ rights, housing, civil rights, and more. The Roberts Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, coupled with the statute of limitations-resetting decision in Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors, dismantled this precedent, shifting the balance of power significantly, with courts assuming a greater role in determining the scope of regulatory authority.
The implications of these two decisions are profound, touching nearly every aspect of public policy. While we are uncertain how future courts may move forward without deference to Chevron, the potential of these rulings in tandem is concerning, particularly in light of President Trump’s unprecedented attacks on federal agencies and their public servants since the start of his second administration this year.
Given the dramatic changes to the administrative state in just a few short months, CCLP’s Litigation Director Annie Martínez has produced a comprehensive issue brief analyzing the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine. The brief, Life after Chevron, explores how the two court rulings shift power from federal agencies to the courts, affecting critical policy areas including health care, workers’ rights, housing, and civil rights. From there, the brief explores paths for continued agency influence and policy oversight, particularly through legislative collaboration, strategic rulemaking, and guidance development.
Key findings
The brief highlights several major policy areas affected by the Court’s decision:
- The end of the Chevron Doctrine marks a shift in how courts must rule on interpretations of law by federal executive branch agencies.
- Potential implications for the Loper Bright decision must be examined in the light of the Corner Post case the Supreme Court also ruled last year, which changes the statute of limitations for claims against federal regulations.
- Regulations affecting every aspect of American life may be upended by these two Supreme Court decisions, as regulated entities may choose to file new claims against even long-standing regulations. However, the outcomes of such challenges are yet to be determined.
- Particular areas of regulation which are relevant in the fight against poverty include health, worker’s rights, housing, and disability, and civil rights.
- Loper Bright and Corner Post do not directly impact state-level regulation in Colorado.
- While these decisions leave much of the administrative state on less stable ground, federal agencies still have key opportunities to influence legislation and continue to maintain their areas of oversight.
Download the full issue brief Life after Chevron in our resource library.
